"What you will be privileged to witness will not be an interrogation, but an act of salesmanship as silver-tongued and thieving as ever moved used cars, Florida swamp land or bibles. For what I am selling is a long prison term to a client who has no genuine use for the product." ~ Frank Pembleton, Homicide Life On The Street
"If a murder is committed in Baltimore and no homicide detective takes the call, did that murder occur?" ~ John Munch, Homicide Life On The Street
Ah, Homicide. For several years it was the best television show on North American airwaves, until its last two seasons when it got an idiot in the cast whose last name rhymes with calzone (not a fan of the character, what can I say?). The drama about the work homicide detectives in Baltimore do was one of the finest ensemble casts ever put into one show, and among them was one Frank Pembleton, as played by the great Andre Braugher. When he had a suspect to interrogate, watching Pembleton at work (and by extension Braugher in performance) was like watching the master at work. Just a few minutes of Pembleton sitting across from me in that interrogation room, and I'd be spilling everything about the jewel heist and where we've got the loot stashed...Did I say that last part out loud?
Grover, back in his days as a prime suspect |
The first ever game of murderscotch |
Given my genre of the spy thriller, torture might be an option, but not for me. I have issues with use of torture, and I don't particularly think it's effective in getting information. In fact, one of my main characters would have issues with its use, given that he's been tortured himself. That's to be left to the prequel, of course, which is yet to be written.
So torture is out. Instead I've been writing the sequence as a psychological battle of wills, and so the Pembleton Techniques (memo to Barry Levinson: why didn't you trademark that?) have been on my mind as I've been writing. One of my characters does most of the talking, and not the one you might expect. Others haven't said anything yet. The point of view shifts between prisoner and protagonists. I've been combining both accusation and empathy in the interrogation. I've used cold hard facts. And I'm using fear and intimidation. It's all meant to wear down the terrorist, to bring him to the point where he gives up.
I did face one challenge early on. My terrorist is in a sedated state, coming out of it as my protagonists arrive. There was the possibility that it might mirror a similar scene in the Tom Clancy novel Rainbow Six, where a terrorist gives away a whole lot of information while under the influence of sedatives, tricked by the protagonists. I didn't want to go that route, and I knew it might be a problem. When I got to that point, I had come across a way to write it so that it didn't mirror that book. Besides, unlike Tom, I don't feel like writing where the sedatives were made, how they're distributed into the bloodstream, who the custodian is on duty that night, how long ago the hospital bed was made...
As of this point, the interrogation continues. By the time you read this, I'll probably be well past it. It's an involved, extended scene, but the breaking point for my terrorist is in sight. And I didn't even have to resort to having the protagonists use Barbra Streisand music to break his will. Of course, hearing her strangling the cat over a torturous rendition of Hello Dolly would put the interrogators and the suspect in mutual agony, wouldn't it?
Now while I might not use torture as a means of gathering information for my characters.... it can still be funny. Assuming you're not so easily offended, that is. And so I leave you with these...
No comments:
Post a Comment